unrealityfree ([info]unrealityfree) wrote,

What is activism?

A central theme in almost any personal growth process is to realize choice in regard to experience of existence. It is the recognition of this personal freedom that empowers us to break free of conditioned interpretations of the world. Activism to me is interacting with loved ones and other people in my personal life out of a consciousness of this essential freedom to control my experience. I can then take this capability to create prosperous interactions with me as I interact with a group of people or a social paradigm. By creating my experience I can actively influence the dynamic of my interaction with others in a positive way. This is activism. This way of interaction “reels in” my projections, negates my need for defensiveness, removes the critical perception I might have of myself and others, and takes away the need to make accusations. In doing so, it shows me that my assumptions are usually wrong. Essentially, my freedom to create my own experience facilitates a move toward unity and harmony with that which I am interacting, as opposed to a move away in conflict and isolated defensiveness. By becoming conscious of my ability to control my experience of existence, I have become conscious of how my interpretations affect this experience and how my actions have effect on the world around me. This gives me the tools I need to do my part in creating our society in a healthy way.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

  • 2 comments

[info]bearokee

June 30 2006, 22:46:44 UTC 5 years ago

You make great points. I like the term you coined that relates to activism. Don't know if you want it posted for all to see. That's up to you. The term suggests something beyond the already existing definition of "activism," which like you say, to be the highest and most productive activism, requires the consciousness of the activists throughout. This can be said of any kind of action too, it seems.

Do you like using the other term more, or do you like claiming the word "activism" to mean everything you've said here? It seems strong, in a way, to do that too.

Anonymous

July 1 2006, 00:31:59 UTC 5 years ago

My description of activism is meant to refine the accepted definition of activism and describe what true activism would be. An action is futile if it does not get results, and in a similar light, activism that is innafective is better not practiced as it can actualy be detrimental as it perpetuates division instead of influencing cooperation. Therefore, while the term activism is generaly used to denote action for social change, my definition annotates that if the action does not in fact result in a move towards unity and cooperation, which is the only kind of social change that would ultimately be beneficial, it instead should be called reactivism, or perhaps defensivism, or simply domination. Interactivism does actualy describe the concept that I am stating, but instead I would rather like to say that activism in any sense should be a move towards interaction. If it does not, I don't think its actualy activism, but instead could simply be called a conflict.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…